Here the latest release from Gioconda…
We wish you a full merry Christmas…fill it with smiles, joy and temperance.
IMPORTANTE: Se non volete spoiler sul film Okija NON leggete questo articolo!
Qualche giorno fa ho avuto l’occasione, concessami dal raffreddore poi tramutatosi in influenza, di guardare un bellissimo film su Netflix che forse molti di voi già conoscevano.
Ebbene, finisco sempre per vedere i film cult in ritardo rispetto alle altre persone ma credo che questo mi permetta anche di assaporarli di più, senza fretta, perchè non ho l’urgenza di esprimere il mio parere a qualcuno, scambiare i miei pensieri, ma posso cullarmeli silenzionsamente, senza pressioni, finchè non mi viene voglia di scriverci qualcosa. Ecco il momento.
Okija mi è entrato nel cuore. Non è il messaggio prepotentemente ecologista che il film trasmette, non è il ritratto poco lusinghiero della società attuale, ricco di paradossi, dolceamari controsensi giustificati dal bisogno più primordiale alla sopravvivenza. Non è nemmeno il tema della “fame nel mondo”, mantra inverso della nostra Expo 2015.
E’ per la semplice dolcezza con cui una bambina vive, naturalmente, con un essere che potrebbe apparire (ed appare infatti nel film) orribile e spaventoso se trasportato fuori da quel contesto: dalle foreste della Corea del Sud incontaminate e selvagge.
Mija è una dolce ragazzina coreana che vive con suo nonno in una foresta. All’età di 4 anni, dopo la morte dei genitori, entra nella sua vita Okja, un “supermaiale” non dichiaratamente OGM, consegnato al nonno perché lo allevasse con premura per 10 anni, al termine dei quali avrebbe dovuto restituirlo alla multinazionale sua proprietaria – la Mirando corporation – per un fantomatico concorso di bellezza tra i “supermaiali” di tutto il mondo.
Il film si apre con Mija e Okija che vivono, mangiano, giocano e scorrazzano liberamente per i boschi prima di una delle tante chiamate ” a tavola” per la cena da parte del nonno. La sensibilità di Okija e il suo amore per Mija si possono intravvedere in diverse scene. La più toccante è quella del salvataggio intelligente di Mija da parte di Okija. Okija cerca di trattenere la corda a cui è legata Mija e che è il solo mezzo per non farla cadere nel vuoto. Purtroppo le zampe di Okija sono piatte e la corda slitta, facendo scivolare Mija sempre più giù nel burrone. All’improvviso, il regista, inquadrando prima il volto di Okija e dopo un tronco sporgente dalla parte rocciosa, ci fa comprendere quello che sta pensando Okija: usare il bastone come leva per scaraventare Mija verso l’altro ma cadere inevitabilmente nello strapiombo. Okija lo fa. Non ci pensa due volte. Si sacrifica per la sua MIja e sopravvive. Malandata ma felice, Okija ha salvato la sua Mija. E’ il mondo della meraviglia, è il mondo dell’infanzia, della verità e della spontaneità. Quello che molti di noi faticano anche solo a ricordare nella propria routine quotidiana. Questo mondo è una metafora ed è l’essenza della vita.
Da questo idillio perfetto fatto di salvataggi ed animali fiabeschi in grado di pensare, sentire e di farlo nel modo più puro e sincero possibile, entrambe vengono strappate con l’avvento degli adulti del mondo industrializzato che, come evidente nella chiusura del film, ragionano solo secondo una logica, pulita e lineare: gli affari.
Curiosamente, il CEO della Mirando corporation non si sottrae mai a questa logica, nemmeno la sua gemella identica e più manifestamente cattiva, ma la dichiara apertamente e con naturalezza, come se fosse la sola possibile per gestire le cose del mondo..quello vero.
Ed è così che quando Okija, ormai catturata e seviziata dalla Miranda corporation, sta per essere abbattuta, come accade a molti animali da allevamento oggi, Mijia capisce.
Mija smette di cercare di salvare Okija con la logica del mondo della meraviglia e capisce che deve parlare una nuova lingua, mettersi al pari del suo interlocutore, usare lo stesso codice comunicativo e di scambio: gli affari, il pragmatico, i soldi. Ed ecco che lo scambio tra un maialino d’oro donatole dal nonno per il suo futuro matrimonio, con la nuova CEO della Miranda corporation, diventa l’unico modo, la sola lingua che quest’ultima possa comprendere. “Qualcosa per qualcos’altro”. Una logica tanto lontana da quella espressa nel gesto iniziale di salvataggio di Okija con Mija, quanto attuale, semplice, pulita e chiara.
Quando Mija fa pace con le regole del mondo attuale, degli adulti, del pragmatismo, del soldo, può tornare al suo della meraviglia ma nè lei nè Okija saranno più le stesse. Ora sanno la verità. Bong Joon-ho, ancora una volta con un sapiente gioco di prospettive, ci fa comprendere che Mija e Okija non saranno più le stesse. Sono cresciute, sono cambiate e per quanto non abbiano ceduto, apparentemente, in realtà, hanno soggiaciuto alla logica del più forte.
In realtà, da spettatori possiamo intuire che le nostre due eroine sono solo cresciute ed hanno imparato che nel mondo esiste più di una lingua: quella delle emozioni, dei sentimenti, del profondo e quella del concreto, del pragmatico dei bisogni essenziali e di base che risponde ad una logica non sempre opposta alla prima.
Per essere davvero liberi bisogna imparare a parlarle tutte. Per capire che tutte inquadrano una scatola della nostra possibile, o effettiva, esistenza senza esaurirne la complessità. Più logiche, lingue, valori, interessi comprendiamo più siamo liberi, perchè ne capiamo la parzialità. Mija e Okija in Corea vivono la stessa parzialità. Sono egoiste che ritornano a casa. Ora ne sono consapevoli. Forse è questo l’elemento davvero straziante che adombra leggermente il loro volto ed il loro sguardo qualche secondo prima della della fine del film.
Non c’è più solo la dicotomia tra infanzia, sentimento, meraviglia, stupore, natura e industria, OGM, pragmatismo, denaro. C’è il bisogno di andare oltre entrambe e capire se ne esistano anche altre.
Forse perchè mi riconosco in questo anelito ho apprezzato molto questo film, delicato, diretto e sostanziale. Forse spero che ognuno di noi abbia questa spinta ad andare oltre come segreto della vita vera e della felicità.
Science journal claimed
“Clubby and ‘disturbing’ citation behavior by researchers in Italy has surged”
The rate at which scientists in Italy cite themselves and their compatriots is rising faster than in 10 other developed countries, according to a new study. The surge in Italy’s clubby citation behavior is likely the result of a 2010 law requiring productivity standards for academic recruitment or promotion, the study authors say.
The findings are a cautionary tale for research administrators who rely too much on citation metrics in allocating resources and making decisions on career advancement, says study author Giuseppe De Nicolao, an engineer at the University of Pavia in Italy. Linking professional advancement to citation indicators can prod scientists into unintended behaviors and make the metrics unreliable, he says.
The findings are “disturbing,” says Ludo Waltman, a bibliometric expert at Leiden University in the Netherlands who was not involved in the study. To limit questionable citation practices, Waltman says, the Italian evaluation system should exclude self-citations and consider factors such as a researcher’s experience and activities in addition to citation counts.
After the 2010 law was passed, Italy began to regulate academic recruitment and promotion using indicators such as citation counts. It was intended to address concerns about nepotism and a lack of meritocracy.
Under the policy, academics can’t seek a job or a promotion as an associate or full professor unless they meet at least two of three indicators of research productivity. In fields such as medicine and natural sciences, these indicators include the number of publications, the number of citations received, and h-index—a combined measure of productivity and citation impact.
It is funny to read that other countries always question Italy. It is even much more amusing to see that this often happens from inside. And this time it’s research turn.
News: Italian researchers cite themselves too much. This is disturbing. Claims journals.
However, what does “too much” means? When is “too much”? If this wave of self-citations is due to Gelmini law and the inclusion of bibliometric indicators into the evaluation practices of Italian researchers, why not focusing on another index, not on quantity, but on pertinence, relevance, germaneness?
Are these citations not pertinent to the work in which they were reported? This can be the right question to explain our difficult and complex culture and system.
Are they disturbing compared to what? Other countries? …are we really comparable along this line, following this logic?
No secrets, no tricks. We might be just a novel and case-study compared to other countries. Actually, it is exactly what our colleagues found in their comparative analysis published in PlosOne recently. Nothing more. No clubs or network cliques.
Authors stated “Italy became, both globally and for a large majority of the research fields, the country with the highest inwardness and the lowest rate of international collaborations. The change in the Italian trend occurs in the years following the introduction in 2011 of national regulations in which key passages of professional careers are governed by bibliometric indicators.”
Yes, it is true. Sometimes quantity is more rewarded than quality. Our choice? I don’t think so. Did we adapt in a respectful way? Yes! How? We thought outside the box.
What does it mean? Easy to say. Also Authors suggested this as a possible explanation but maybe, they should deepen one point. They claimed that:
“Two explanations for an increase of cardinality of physiological quota A could be advanced. According to the first one, internationalization, the increase may be due to a sudden rise, after 2009, of the amount of international collaborations of Italian scholars. In fact, we have already observed that, other things left unchanged, an increase of international collaboration positively affects the inwardness indicator. However, Fig 2 rules out this explanation. No peculiar increase in the Italian international collaboration can be spotted”.
Maybe, it is not the case that we collaborate more with European or Extra-european researchers or that our research topics are narrow. Maybe, we collaborate better. We might be just more social than other researchers. Maybe, we pay more attention to what other colleagues already published, because we know them in person, and we are really interested in their work across the globe.
We are just more smartly social than other researchers. We don’t need many social dinners, social events or forced happy hours. We care about other people, other researchers naturally or given our educational path, especially if they are Italians and do valuable research. The answer maybe not in the cliques, but in the whole network.
Nothing new under the sun, check one of my previous articles: https://transformativexperiences.wordpress.com/2018/12/10/how-to-win-an-erc-grant-being-social-in-social-sciences/
I thank Authors for their valuable analysis.
I just beg journalists to study more and not spread fake news about Italians, especially to Italians. We are a community. Just ask to researchers. We can help you read also scientific articles in the right way.
I know, I’ve been silent for months, and now it is time to recover.
I always have so many things to write down and so little time to do it. This period has been so intense and full of travels and changes that, sometimes, when I wake up, I forget where I am and what I am expected to to during the incoming day.
I wish to share with you a special occasion I had for my research on music flow at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics in Frankfurt am Main. I was invited to speak about our research on music flow on an exclusive Symposium at the the Max Planck Institute.
BTW, what is flow?
ok, keep your eyes closed and keep breathing while you are imagining the last time you did something so involving to absorpt you totally, when time passed extremely quickly or slowly, you forgot everything else except the task you were doing, you felt so at ease, everything was under control and perfectly flew without interruptions. This is flow. An optimal psychological state you live while immersed in an activity you can perfectly manage, although it is still challenging, and all the rest is left apart.
This definition resonates so well with me if I think about my musical practice. When I sing, I am always in flow. Time stops, I am “in the moment“, “In the groove”, “was ‘tuned in’ to what I was doing”…(Martin, & Jackson, 2008)
Four years ago, in 2015 during my internship, I wrote my first article, which was also the first systematic review on this experience in musical contexts. I called it “When music Flows“. To be honest, a lot of things have flown since that article. First, I started and finished my doctorate. Then, I got a PhD position keeping on my favourite topics., and discover that Flow is a sort of potential transformative experience but at that time I was not aware of it. Crucially, I have been invited to talk about this work at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics by professor Winfried Menninghaus’ group. When I received the email I was astonished and kept thinking about “Is it really true?”. Yes, it was true and it has been an amazing experience. Two full-time days dedicated to flow research across different fields, including music.
Flow is music is considered the key of success….want to know more? Go on reading!
Here’s the opening.
Why this Symposium on flow?
“Enjoyment appears at the boundary between boredom and anxiety, when the challenges are just balanced with the person’s capacity […].” – this quote by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (2001), one of the pioneers of Positive Psychology, illustrates how a person can find pleasure in an activity and become completely engaged with it. In artistic contexts – whether it is creating, performing, or receiving art – enjoyment of the activity in its own right plays a central role. By studying artists, who show a high degree of dedication to their craft regardless of external rewards, Csikszentmihalyi discovered a specific state of mind associated with such intrinsic enjoyment: Flow.
Nowadays Flow is not only a popular term people use in their everyday language to refer to the feeling of “being in the zone” while doing something. It is also the object of an ever-evolving research field, sparking scientific interest amongst scholars from a wide range of disciplines such as psychologists, neuroscientists, and health scientists. In this symposium we will bring together experts in Flow research, to present and discuss recent advances and future directions of the field. The symposium’s main focus is on Flow in the context of art, music, and creativity, but also on psychophysiological and neurophysiological indicators of Flow, as well as on motivational and interindividual factors contributing to this experience. We are looking forward to two interesting days of scientific presentations and debate!”
I was so happy to let other researchers know which progress is possible now in the field of music. I presented our perspective on group flow, a state of low enlarged to more than a single individual and involving an entire group of people, I showed our encouraging results and met wonderful people, such as my hero, professor Örjan de Manzano, the first who studied psychophysiology of flow in musicians, his colleague, professor László Harmat, who is doing great research on group flow and who we hope to collaborate with in the future, the sweet and brilliant Corinna Peifer, international expert in the psychophysiology of flow, professor Fredrik Ullén, who introduced a new genetic and dispositional big data perspective on flow, as well as René Weber, who presented the Synchronization Theory of Flow, and the promising researcher Kelsey Finnley, who developed the scale of Aesthetic experiences including flow (I hope to be in charge of its italian validation).
I have been so happy to be among these people and share our insights ideas and data. I wish to thank them all.
Below the full list of speakers:
Arnold Bakker (Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands)
Alice Chirico (Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Milan/Brescia, Italy)
Genevieve Cseh (Buckinghamshire New University, England)
Kelsey Finnley (Claremont Graduate University, USA)
László Harmat (Linnaeus University Växjö, Sweden)
David Harris (University of Exeter, England)
Johannes Keller (University of Ulm, Germany)
Örjan de Manzano (Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden)
Corinna Peifer (Ruhr University Bochum, Germany)
Birte Thissen (Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics Frankfurt, Germany)
Fredrik Ullén (Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden)
Martin Ulrich (University of Ulm, Germany)
Regina Vollmeyer (Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)
Michael Wagner (University of Ulm, Germany)
René Weber (University of California Santa Barbara, USA)
P.S. A special thanks to professor Johannes Keller who assisted me and recover me when I got lost in the building looking for the cafeteria 🙂 🙂 . He is a man full of talent and passion, an open-minded person, and passionate beekeeper. I’ve loved sharing ideas with him.
And a “see you later” to Manuela M. Marin, expert in music and who will visit us in Milan in the final part of 2019: see you in Milan!
- New collaborations:
- New insight about how to enter flow while playing, performing or listening to music.
- Flow alone and in groups.
Just a quick reminder for the big tomorrow event on Transformative experience design held in Università Cattolica of Milan, room G.127 Pio XI, scheduled 10.00-13.00.
We wait for you!
Un sogno che si avvera: domani per la prima volta in Italia presenteremo ad Aziende, colleghi ricercatori, studenti e professionisti, il nostro modello sul Transformative Design.
Quando? ore 10.00-13.00 domani 20 maggio!
Dove? Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano Aula Aula G.127 Pio XI.
Per chi? Tutti coloro che vogliono capire cosa si nasconda dietro questa parola così usata oggi “Transformation” e come sia possibile sfruttarla al meglio in tutti i settori.
Change is the main aim of all scientists. We study a phenomenon to understand why it happens, which its consequences are, how to improve it…how to change it.
With people, this aim is far more salient. As psychologists, we all wish people to change. I have tried to capture a peculiar change: the transformative one. We posed it has awe and wonder as its sparkles, and we have wrote many things on it. The main difficulty is to report this complex process into words. Luckily, we have a flexible tool, that is, language, which can help us making sense out the chaos of transformation. Specifically, we have a figure of speech that is frequently used within therapeutic settings to talk about change, that is, metaphors.
Metaphors occurs when a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
I did the same about me. My story, my text…
The story is entitled..
BEYOND THE WOOD, BEYOND THE VALLEY..
I believe we all need stories. Parents told us stories to try to get us to sleep when we were children. We seek stories in books, when we attend the church, when we go to the gym, or we select the song we wish to listen. Stories make sense of life, donate explanations, and reassure us. Each story starts with a main character acting to solve a problem. At the beginning, the protagonist is not aware of the workable solution but keeps trying several paths and suddenly, what was obscure before, slowly starts becoming clearer and acquires a new meaning, a new sense. This is the end of the narrative arch.
I love open-ended stories, those without a clear and definitive conclusion. I use stories to tidy up my world, the world I have always seen but that looks invisible to most people. I see colors of emotions. I have always seen them everywhere. Art, landscapes, close spaces, smiles, memories, all exhibit colors of emotions. And, these colors have always shaken me since I don’t understand their nature and the reason of their existence. Sometimes a “kind” color springed up but it became too intense for me and, suddenly, I felt distressed. I just wish to make it less intense but, often, I failed and the “kind” color turned into its opposite. This brought forth sadness, need for loneliness and cold. It happened because my life has so many colors, and there is one particular color that has always given meaning to everything: it is like a mix of purple, violet, red and blue and it reminds me to awe & wonder. I know it is funny but I have always looked for wonder & awe in my life, I have always looked for a wonder tinged with mystery as the most profound essence of everything. I have built my young career on it. I call it “awe” and I define it as a complex emotion stemming from vast stimuli forcing us to change deeply and durably. It is the “baffing wonder”. I’ve fed on it since I was a child. It might look gorgeous but this path is full of loneliness and lack of comprehension from others and myself. I am the first who struggles to understand what is going on. However, I know that to seek for awe, you should adopt a different perspective, thus staying outside from the perceptual, accustomed, accepted world, indicated as the “right world”, the “real” one, ruled by a set of established norms. It means drifting aways from pretend comfortable daily certainties, from shared norms linking us to others, to family and relatives.
Today, I see how far I have drifted away. I delved into a wood but I believed that I was closer to home than I really was. I stumbled, It started raining, and I built a shelter and I took refuge in it. I felt cold, hungry, pain and grief but I always listened to a comfortable voice behind me that tries to reassure me. I came up in a beautiful clearing and I thought it was the finish line but the voice told me that was just the beginning. The behind voice pushed me always. It was enough to move on. The green clearing left room for a mix of blu, yellow and violet, which made me hope for the best. Suddenly, a storm blew up. I was small and unarmed. I stopped hearing the behind voice and I started hearing a new voice ahead. The new voice told me incompresible stories but I felt reassured by it. The voice behind was soft and almost dumb. While I was walking to drive awe out, I had to choose whether to cross a river or to come back. I closed my eyes and I chose to jump and risk my life to cross the river, from one side to the other side. I touched the other side. I stopped hearing the behind voice forever.
I was on the slopes of a high mountain and there was a hand helping me climb it. It was not the ned but a new beginning. I climbed while I was trying to remember the old voice that I left behind. That was my first awe-driving force. It looked as if it was still there. Another voice told me to keep on climbing because that was the right way.
Now, I lost the ability to hear the behind voice, which has been progressively replaced by faded memories. I am no more alone, despite I have lost my behind voice. I still don’t know if I should stay, climb or come back to tell anyone that a new world beyond the wood and beyond the valley exists. A new world showing a new sky full of new colors of life. The world proceeds even beyond what the voice ahed is telling me.
Now, it’s just me and awe. I haven’t found it yet, probably and luckily I will never do, but I can see its aura. It is enough. It is always made of a mix of purple, violet and red and it is brighter. I am alone, but I cannot feel like this. I just wish to bring the first voice with me, open its eyes, make it stretching its arms to the wonder, to awe, so that also the first behind voice could tell a new story. I just wish to save it and all people who remained behind.
I have now a new story that helps me keep climbing the mountain. I have my metaphor.
And, now, the soundtrack of this story is this..